News

If the justices step in, it wouldn’t necessarily have anything to do with the validity of the trafficking charges themselves ...
"The 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court will decide what they want and then try to rationalize it," one First Amendment ...
Still pending before the Supreme Court this week is an appeal from Trump's lawyers that seeks the firing of three Democratic ...
In a series of terse, unsigned orders, the court has often been giving the green light to President Trump’s agenda without a ...
The Supreme Court expressed its concern over the Enforcement Directorate summoning lawyers for client representation. Highlighting the erosion of legal independence, the court called for guidelines ...
Appeals courts divided "over whether nonreligious parents’ rights are limited to the initial enrollment decision" and "how ...
Speaking exclusively with Washington Examiner, Cameron shares his belief on how U.S. v. Skrmetti has set a precedent when it comes to transgender ideology.
In a precedent-based legal system, you can’t know what the law is if you don’t have judicial opinions explaining why the courts have reached their conclusions.
A legal expert warns the Supreme Court is enabling Trump's unchecked power by using the shadow docket to silently approve ...
With the Supreme Court’s decision in this case, yet another dagger is aimed at the very heart of the Constitution.
Immigrant rights organizations sued the state arguing that its new law conflicts with federal immigration law, and under ...
Opinion: Kelley Drye's Alysa Hutnik and Gregory Pruden examine what the Supreme Court's decision upholding an age ...