In 1979, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare issued a policy interpretation of Title IX that included a three-prong test to be considered in assessing an institution's compliance.

April 16, 1993 In Cohen v. Brown University, a federal court rules Brown did not meet any elements of the three-prong test for the participation requirement of Title IX.

Schools may choose any of three options for satisfying Title IX's participation component. Those options include the controversial proportionality gauge. Satisfaction of any of the three standards ...

Three-prong test proponents argue that Title IX as a whole is getting the blame for a budgetary crisis within college athletics.

The Title IX athletics regulations have long been accused both of shortchanging women and of resulting in the elimination of hundreds of men’s teams across the country. A panel of experts will examine ...

How is Title IX compliance measured in college sports? And what is the ‘three-prong test’? Ever since the 1970s, the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) has used a so-called “three-prong test ...

At the 50th anniversary of Title IX, a federal law that bans discrimination based on sex in any educational program or activity that receives federal money, let's review key dates.

The case is notable for finding that the three-part Title IX test generally applied to higher education entities also applies to high schools.

Perhaps most influentially, it detailed what became known as the “three-prong test.” To provide equitable participation opportunities, a school had to do at least one of three things: ...

She had been the first woman to receive a UCLA basketball scholarship. 1979: U.S. officials put into effect the important three-prong test for Title IX compliance when it comes to athletics.

Bell Ringer Assignment Why does Title IX apply to sports? Explain the three-prong test relating to Title IX compliance in sports. What were some of the consequences to the proportionality rule?